Science Rules
Science is important. Consequently, the funding and policy decisions that the United States government makes about science and technology are vital to the progression of global innovation and economic development. These exceedingly important aspects of governance are often overlooked, however, and have been particularly absent in the ongoing wrangling for position by the three remaining presidential candidates in the upcoming US presidential election.
A coalition of important medical, scientific, and technological academies, in concert with a large number of concerned citizens -- like myself -- think this is a real problem and have joined an initiative called Science Debate 2008. This is our statement of purpose:
"Given the many urgent scientific and technological challenges facing America and the rest of the world, the increasing need for accurate scientific information in political decision making, and the vital role scientific innovation plays in spurring economic growth and competitiveness, we call for a public debate in which the U.S. presidential candidates share their views on the issues of The Environment, Health and Medicine, and Science and Technology Policy."
I recommend that everyone head over to their website and affiliated YouTube page (I've also posted these links up on my delicious page) and take a look. Hopefully the politicians vying for our country's top executive position will take notice.